Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 07:02

Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How and why do cats purr? Scientists finally found the answers - Earth.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Childhood Trauma Rewires the Brain Through Inflammation - Neuroscience News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Here's Why This Year Will Be "Different" For Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce - BuzzFeed
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
This Powerful Airplane Engine Has Been Around For Over 70 Years & Is Still Used Today - SlashGear
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is there a future where LA's wildfire seasons no longer exist?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here’s a guide to the latest. - The Boston Globe
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Psyche keeps its date with an asteroid, but now it’s running in backup mode - Ars Technica
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Donkey ‘Drops Off’ Baby with Human Mom After Apparently Needing a Break - PetHelpful